I am checking that you have the following:
1. A clear topic sentence that introduces the primary source/ speaker or artist (if provided) and makes a claim about the document that focuses on a historic category.
2. Details Analyzed: Paraphrased/Quoted document effectively
a. Paraphrase when you are describing what the author/speaker stated. Then explain why what the author/speaker said was important
b. Quotes are for analysis=Something of interest/significance was stated that you want to analyze (Analysis should be at least twice the length of a quote).
C. Follow specific Format:
Quotes: Last Name stated, "" (Last Name, year). This is significant because..
Paraphrased: Last Name stated, summary of what was stated which was significant because... (Last Name, year).
3. 2 SFI terms are used and bolded for each response and are significant to claim made in your topic sentence
4. Response is fluid and follow English grammatical rules [Complete sentences with complete ideas and be sure you are writing in the past
tense



Jane Addams, "The Democratic Household" (1902)
The modern woman finds herself educated to recognize a stress of social obligation which her family did not in the least anticipate when they sent her to college. She finds herself, in addition, under an impulse to act her part as a citizen of the world. She accepts her family inheritance with loyalty and affection, but she has entered into a wider inheritance as well, which, for lack of a better phrase, we call the social claim. This claim has been recognized for four years in her training, but after her return from college the family claim is again exclusively and strenuously asserted.

Woodrow Wilson, "The president of the united states'"
If he is indeed the executive, he must act almost entirely by delegation, and is in the hands of his colleagues. He is likely to be praised if things go well, and blamed if they go
wrong;
He is the representative of no constituency, but of the whole people... It is for this reason that it will often prefer to choose a man rather than a party. A president whom it trusts can not only lead it, but form it to his own views.
It is the extraordinary isolation imposed upon the president by our system that makes the character and opportunity of his office so extraordinary. In him are centered both opinion and party
The President is at liberty, both in law and conscience, to be as big a man as he can. His capacity will set the limit; and if Congress be overborne by him, it will be no fault of the makers of the Constitution,- it will be from no lack of constitutional powers on its part, but only because the President has the nation behind him and Congress has not.
He has no means of compelling Congress except through public opinion

Can someone analyze these 2 excerpts.- please it's due today